6
(5) that he committed
the park
by
o judgment in Unding in Curt an
Extract from the opinion of the Acting Attorney General communicated to him in this letter
let's letter
reading
in
g
20 Sept. and again
Court in the current y
in the extradition can
the Cl: text's letter
Au
his judgment
what from
23 February and
we in this.
7
30 para
that the disapproval after conduct in that aspect conveyed by the Gov. letter
was deserved
] 784 that the Acting Attorney General
81
W
fully justified by the language used by Mr Wedchem in
announcing his decision in
4 adjourn the Extradition case
in assuming
his his report of 26 Sept that Wodehouse; in reason for much adjournment, was that related to guided in his decision of the result of the bribing case.
and that Mr Wodehouse.
subsequent villain
a
different reason
rendered
for the adjournment is not consistent with his previous statements.
ix that the Acting Attorney General acted
strictly within his powers in
directing
nolle prosequi in the case
13
of the charge
subornation of perjury
and as stand
had nothing to do with that case
that case he might
end to have imported it into his memorial
With regard to the 4.
Premervil
the
I would
Lag
portion of the
Bat
MINUTE PAPER.
11) Mr Woodchense's conduct that
prima facie
decision that had t
case was made out against the three sinners appears the inconsistent with the view and what h wodied in expressed in his judgment and still more Despatch
strongly in his letter K the Coliled? May of the evidence upon which he decided and his conduct displayed a compulsion.
7
mind shock
An
ว
2
unaccountable
(2) that he seems to have considered that
it was y
with
he committed
Out
**
consequence
how on whether
discharged the prisoners
the responsibility of deciding whether they should be surrendered would wash with in Council whereas it was his
learned
the former
plain duty, as he would have now
from the judgment of the Supreme Court to examine to his judgment
As
15 Whether.
the wider schelleche a prima facie
case in the same
the case
of a charge
18
in manner
CALL
in
preliminary Examination,
indictable offence committed
an
within his jurisdiction.
91
6
(5) that he committed
te park
bry
o judgment in Unding in Curt an
Extract from the opinion ofthe Acting attorney Sineral communicated to him in this let-
let's letter
reading
in
g
20 Mpt. and again
Court in the currn y
in the setradition can
the Cl: text's letter
Au
вой
his pudymad
whart from
23 February and
we in this.
7
30 pe
that the disapproval after conduct in that aspect conveyed by the God. letter
was deserved
] 784 that the Acting Memes fineral
81
W
fully justified by the language used by MWedchem in
ancancing his duis in
4 adjiere the Extradition ware
in apuming
iis his report of 26 tpt that wowedchen; in reason for much adjourment, was that re arted to guided in his decision of the result of the berging case.
and that Mr Wodehouse.
subsequent villain
a
different reason
renated
for the adjournment is not casis with his previous statements.
ix that the Acting Attomy fineral acted
strith within his peores in
helle prosequi in the care
13
directing
care of the charger
subornation of perjury
and as stand
had nothing to do with that case
that case he might
end to have imported it into his memorial
With regard, 4the 4.
Premervil
the
I would
Lag
portion of the
Bat
MINUTE PAPER.
11) Mr Woodchense's comedy that
prima facie
decesin that had t
case was made ent against the tre siners appears the inconsistent with the view and wat h wodied in expressed in his judgment and still more Despatch
strongly in his letter K the Celiled? May of the windince upon which he decided and his conduct displayed & compusion.
7
mind whock
An
ว
2
unaccountable
(2) that he seems Whave aonsidered that
it was y
with
he committed
Qut
**
crusquence
how on whether
discharged the prisoners
the respenstitit of deciding whether they thould I surrendered would wash with in Mouncil whereas it was his
learned
the former
phan duty, as he with have now
from the judgment of the Supreme Court to exarsin to his pudgment
As
15 Wether.
the wider schelleche a primi pacie
puilla in the same
the case
of a chayeg
18
ar manner
CALL
in
preliminary Examination,
indictable offence committe
an
within his paris dection.
91
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.